Many savers want their money to do some good. But how, exactly?
There are four main methods. They have very different effects on the world.
First method, the oldest: exclusion. You remove from the portfolio the sectors you consider harmful.
Tobacco, weapons, coal. These companies simply do not appear in the fund.
It is simple and clear. You know what you do not own. But what really changes?
When you sell ten thousand euros of shares on the market, someone else buys them for ten thousand euros.
The company receives nothing and loses nothing. Its shares have simply changed owner.
Exclusion keeps your hands clean. It rarely deprives the company of money.
Second method: best in class. No sector is removed, you keep the least bad in each.
In the app, this chapter is animated and narrated, card by card. Start free trial.
Download on theApp StoreSay five oil companies. The fund keeps the one that pollutes least, or invests most in the transition.
The idea: encourage competition towards better. But your green fund can then contain oil. That often surprises people.
Third method: impact. Funding what would not exist without you.
Here, the money goes straight to the project: a new solar plant, a start-up, homes to build.
It is the only method where your euro creates something new. But these investments are often riskier, and harder to sell.
Fourth method, the least known: shareholder engagement. Staying a shareholder, precisely to have a say.
A shareholder votes at the general meeting. They can ask questions, file resolutions, and elect directors.
In May two thousand twenty-one, a small fund owning about two hundredths of a per cent of ExxonMobil got three directors elected.
It had convinced the big shareholders that the group's climate strategy put their money at risk.
The twist: whoever sells their shares loses their voice. Whoever stays can change the company from the inside.
Exclude, select, fund, engage. All four can be combined in the same fund.
Before investing, ask which of these four tools the fund really uses. The answer says a lot.
And look at the fees. A responsible fund is still a fund: if it is expensive, you pay a lot.
Investing by your values is possible. But the real effect depends on the method, not the label.
Excluding protects your conscience. Funding and engaging change companies.